Spotify SongDNA Lets You See How Tracks Are Connected


Have you ever listened to a catchy track and wondered where that familiar beat came from or who produced it? Spotify just rolled out a new beta feature called SongDNA to answer exactly those questions. Instead of burying song credits in a boring text list, this interactive tool creates a visual map of the people and the history behind the music you stream.

The update is available now for Premium users and changes how you explore new sounds.

Here’s how the new SongDNA tool works

When you open the Spotify app and look at the Now Playing screen, you will see a new SongDNA card. Tapping on this card opens an interactive web of information. You can see the main artist alongside the songwriters, producers, and audio engineers who helped bring the track to life.

But it goes beyond just listing names. If a song uses a sample from an older hit, SongDNA shows you exactly where that audio originated. You can click on a producer to see what other popular songs they have worked on. You can also explore cover versions and interpolations. It acts like a musical family tree. If you enjoy falling down a rabbit hole of music history, this tool makes the process incredibly easy.

Who gets access to the feature?

Right now, Spotify is testing SongDNA in beta. It is rolling out globally to Premium subscribers on both Android and iOS devices. A wider official launch is expected to happen sometime in April.

Artists and their teams also get special access through the Spotify for Artists platform. They can manage how their credits appear and make sure the behind-the-scenes contributors get the right recognition.

The data powering this feature comes directly from the artists, record labels, and the WhoSampled database that Spotify recently acquired.

Via Android Authority

More about the topics: Spotify

Readers help support Windows Report. We may get a commission if you buy through our links. Tooltip Icon

Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help Windows Report sustain the editorial team. Read more

User forum

0 messages