Snapdragon X Elite Vs. M3: A Close Competition?

M3 offers better gaming performance while X Elite is good choice for multi-core operations

Reading time icon 6 min. read


Readers help support Windows Report. We may get a commission if you buy through our links. Tooltip Icon

Read our disclosure page to find out how can you help Windows Report sustain the editorial team. Read more

snapdragon x elite vs m3

With all the hype created by Qualcomm’s new upcoming processor, Snapdragon X Elite, with Geekbench listings, everyone has a lot of expectations from the hardware component. Another popular player in the arena proving its supremacy is M3. Here, we have compared Snapdragon X Elite vs. M3 to help you understand which is the superior choice.

Snapdragon X Elite vs. M3: Which is best?

Snapdragon X Elite vs. M3: Specifications

Snapdragon X Elite
X1E-80-100
M3
CPU cores12
(dual-core boost)
3 clusters of equally powerful cores, 12 threads
8
(4 performance cores, 4 efficiency cores)
It supports 24 GB unified memory
Instruction Set ARMv9ARMv8
CacheL2: 12MB (shared)L1: 192K (per core) || L2: 16MB (shared)
Frequencies4.0GHz boost
3.4GHz base
3.7GHz performance
2.4GHz efficiency
Memory (as tested)16GB16GB
TransistorsNA25 billion
Fabrications process4 nm3 nm
GraphicsQualcomm Adreno GPU
Up to 3.8 TFLOPs
Apple M3 GPU
Up to 4.1 TFLOPs
10 or 12 cores
NPU
Qualcomm Hexagon NPU
Up to 45 TOPS
10 cores
Up to 18 TOPS
RAMLPDDR5x
Up to 64 GB
8448 MT/s transfer rate
135 GB/s bandwidth
LPDDR5
Up to 24 GB
6400 MT/s transfer rate
100 GB/s bandwidth
TDP23 W
20 W
PCIe version4.04.0
ConnectivityWi-Fi 7
Bluetooth 5.4
Wi-Fi 6E
Bluetooth 5.3

CPU performance

The CPU that comes with Qualcomm’s new hardware component looks fairly better than its predecessors. With 12 performance cores, it is superior to Apple M3, which has 4 performance cores and 4 efficiency cores. However, when it comes to base frequency, Apple M3 is the clear winner.

Qualcomm has released the Snapdragon Elite X, which comes in three variants with slight differences in terms of multithread frequency, TFLOPS, and Dual-core boost. The variants are X1E-84-100, which has 23405 multithread and 3876 single thread, X1E-80-100, which has 22653 multithread and 3350 single thread, and X1E-78-100, which has 23595 multithread and 3195 single thread.

The Apple M3 has no variant and comes with an ARMv8 instruction set, which is lower than Snapdragon Elite.

Graphics performance

The Graphics performance looks promising with the Qualcomm Adreno 750 integrated GPU. For Apple M3, the GPU comes with Dynamic caching, which enables the use of local memory in hardware in real-time.

On the D Mark WildLife Extreme benchmark, which focuses on short-term performance, the Snapdragon X Elite got 6,260 points, while the Apple M3 scored 8,284 points. This indicates that Apple M3-powered computers have better GPU performance than Snapdragon X Elite.

NPU performance

Regarding NPU performance, Snapdragon X Elite can deliver up to 45 TOPS while M3 delivers only upto 18 TOPS. So, for AI-enriched features, X Elite is the go-to.

Gaming performance

Matt Talks Tech, when testing both processors while gaming, Apple M3 maintained higher average frames per second (FPS) in all tested games. This means you will have a better gaming experience on a device powered by M3 than a Windows computer with Snapdragon X Elite.

Battery Life

Qualcomm claims to give twice the battery life on a laptop powered by Snapdragon X Elite than Intel  Core Ultra 7 155H.

Also, when Dave2D, a popular YouTuber, used the Asus Vivobook S15 powered by Snapdragon newest processor with a 70 Wh battery pack and tested it under light load, they found out that the device lasted to 10 hours and 26 minutes, which is close to the MacBook Air M3 (11 hours and 18 minutes).

Overall performance

Regarding power and efficiency, Snapdragon Elite X delivers a well-balanced performance. With a Neural Processing Unit (NPU) of 45 TOPS, it can be considered an AI powerhouse.

Apple M3 is the first chip built on an industry-leading 3-nanometer process, and it features technology that allows 25 billion transistors to be fitted into a smaller space.

GeekBench v6 results

Here are the GeekBench v6 results when common operations used in real-world apps were performed:

Snapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100)Apple M3 
Single core score28803009
Multi-core score1521111815
Operating SystemMicrosoft Windows 11 Pro (64-bit)macOS 14.1 (Build 23B2073)
ModelQualcomm CRD
iMac (24-inch, 2023)
Name
Snapdragon X Elite – X1E84100 – Qualcomm Oryon CPU
Apple M3
Topology 1 Processor, 12 Cores
(12 performance cores)
1 Processor, 8 Cores
4 Performance and 4 efficiency cores
IdentifierARMv8 (64-bit) Family 8 Model 1 Revision 201Apple M3
Base Frequency4.20 GHz4.05 GHz
Cluster 18 Cores4 Cores
Cluster 24 Cores4 Cores
Size16 GB16 GB

Single- Core & Multi-Core performance

Tasks performedSnapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) Single-CoreM3 Single CoreSnapdragon X Elite (X1E-84-100) Multi-Core PerformanceM3 Multi-Core Performance
File Compression2569
369.0 MB/sec
2876
413.0 MB/sec
8183
1.15 GB/sec
8964
1.26 GB/sec
Navigation2308
13.9 routes/sec
2799
16.9 routes/sec
15240
91.8 routes/sec
12579
75.8 routes/sec
HTML5 Browser3188
65.3 pages/sec
3051
62.5 pages/sec
16542
338.7 pages/sec
12920
264.5 pages/sec
PDF Renderer2924
67.4 Mpixels/sec
13610
313.9 Mpixels/sec
18059
416.5 Mpixels/sec
13610
313.9 Mpixels/sec
Photo Library2902
39.4 images/sec
2704
36.7 images/sec
20575
279.2 images/sec
13858
188.1 images/sec
Clang3461
17.0 Klines/sec
3711
18.3 Klines/sec
29422
144.9 Klines/sec
19233
94.7 Klines/sec
Text Processing2724
218.2 pages/sec
2863
229.2 pages/sec
3354
268.6 pages/sec
3708
297.0 pages/sec
Asset Compression2768
85.8 MB/sec
2818
87.3 MB/sec
25006
774.8 MB/sec
14596
452.3 MB/sec
Object Detection2998
89.7 images/sec
2515
75.3 images/sec
12511
374.4 images/sec
9374
280.5 images/sec
Background Blur2852
11.8 images/sec
2790
11.5 images/sec
16355
67.7 images/sec
12119
50.2 images/sec
Horizon Detection2967
92.3 Mpixels/sec
3605
112.2 Mpixels/sec
17891
556.7 Mpixels/sec
15987
497.5 Mpixels/sec
Object Remover2578
198.2 Mpixels/sec
3742
287.7 Mpixels/sec
15765
1.21 Gpixels/sec
12145
933.8 Mpixels/sec
HDR3515
103.1 Mpixels/sec
3390
99.5 Mpixels/sec
17346
509.0 Mpixels/sec
13768
404.0 Mpixels/sec
Photo Filter3434
34.1 images/sec
3672
36.4 images/sec
11852
117.6 images/sec
11573
114.8 images/sec
Ray Tracer2457
2.38 Mpixels/sec
2457
2.38 Mpixels/sec
25819
25.0 Mpixels/sec
13341
12.9 Mpixels/sec
Structure from Motion2858
90.5 Kpixels/sec
3070
97.2 Kpixels/sec
18590
588.6 Kpixels/sec
13532
428.5 Kpixels/sec

The Conclusion: Snapdragon X Elite vs. M3

Qualcomm has 50% more cores, including 12 performance cores, compared to 4 performance and 4 efficiency cores in Apple M3. However, it is only 21% faster.

Also, it is still behind in single-core performance from Apple M3 but has proven to be better in multi-performance, which makes the Qualcomm processor a strong contender for tasks that benefit from parallel processing.

Apple M3 comes with a powerful GPU that delivers superior graphics performance and is better for gaming as well. When it comes to battery efficiency, Snapdragon X Elite appears to be promising, as it can be used for longer operational times compared to its predecessors.

So, if you want a processor with better multi-core capabilities, Snapdragon X Elite should be your go-to. However, if you are looking for a processor efficient in single-core tasks and a better gaming experience, Apple M3 is the best option.

We have also compared Qualcomm against other brands, so for more information, check out our guides on Snapdragon X Elite vs. Z1 Extreme and Snapdragon X Elite vs. M4.

If you are wondering about the hardware differences, don’t miss out on our guide on Snapdragon X Elite versions to know more about each CPU.

To learn how Snapdragon X Elite and Plus compare, we have a guide that covers both series in detail.

What do you think about these new chips by Qualcomm, are they ready to beat Apple M3? Share your thoughts in the comments section below.

More about the topics: CPU, snapdragon

User forum

0 messages