- This Bluestacks vs LDPlayer comparison article will help you find the most reliable Android emulator available on the market.
- When it comes to the actual working speed, there's definitely one winner worthy of your attention.
- The other one takes the cake when it comes to localization because it's an American product.
- Moreover, note that the tips below will show you how to deal with Preset Control Settings.
You can run mobile games on computers using different emulators. There are many free programs on the market: Nox, KoPlayer, Memu, Droid4X, and others.
But the most popular (the first Android emulator in the industry) is, of course, Bluestacks. This program attracted many users by its well-rounded features and simple interface.
But is Bluestacks the best at the moment? For a long time, Nox remained the main competitor of the program in our market – and this confrontation continues. But now LDPlayer has also joined the fight.
According to many gamers, this emulator is faster than Bluestacks, and there are much fewer ads in it! At the same time, the functionality of the application is also at its best!
So, which is better: Bluestacks or LDPlayer? Let’s compare emulators by the most important parameters.
Bluestacks vs LDPlayer – which one is the best choice?
1. Work Speed
The speed of work is the most important criterion. For a long time, Android emulator was heavily loaded with the system, discouraging any desire to run it again.
This was the case in the third version of Bluestacks, but the release of Bluestacks 4 slightly corrected the situation.
Nevertheless, this application cannot be called light – and we are talking here not only about the time of the emulator launch, but also about the speed of its work on low-end PCs in general.
If you turn to LDPlayer after a long time using Bluestacks, you might be surprised, because the program works much faster!
At the same time, the emulator is capable of running heavy applications like Epic Seven, Black Desert Mobile, and Garena Free Fire.
Though BlueStacks 5 Beta version is out and they claim this version is built for faster gaming in weak PCs, the actual performance for specific games is still unsatisfactory.
LDPlayer proves its capabilities in providing fast performance no matter you’re using beast or weak PCs. Thus, LDPlayer wins in this indicator.
LDPlayer : Bluestacks – 1:0
2. Number of ads
Bluestacks is originally a commercial project. Old users may remember the days when this emulator was paid for. Now, this is not the case – but there are many ads that are shown not only on the loading screen.
On Bluestacks desktop, you will constantly have virtual shortcuts leading to the download pages of certain games advertised by Bluestacks. You can delete these shortcuts, but soon they will reappear.
In LDPlayer, this is so far much simpler. There are ads in the App Store developed by LDPlayer. But on the home screen, LDPlayer keeps everything clean, and the program won’t pop up ads during your usage.
When LDPlayer was launched, the emulator also advertises itself. Of course, it is possible that there will be more advertising in this program as it grows. But so far, LDPlayer wins in this parameter as well.
LDPlayer: Bluestacks – 2:0
3. Preset Control Settings
For the most popular games, emulator developers try to create ready-made control settings. You can download a new game and be surprised to see that you don’t have to configure anything. All the keys are already in their places
This situation can happen both with Bluestacks and LDPlayer. Developers keep a close eye on the video game market and add presets in a timely manner.
At the same time, LDPlayer is a Chinese program and it is logical that settings for popular games in China can appear very quickly in it.
In that case, many control settings are tested before the global release. Nevertheless, we recognize the equality of both emulators in this parameter. The developers of both emulators are doing their job well.
LDPlayer: Bluestacks – 3:1
4. Convenience of the interface
From the very start, Bluestacks followed the path of creating its own program interface and that is appreciated by most users.
Unlike Nox and most other emulators that simply use the Android interface, Bluestacks developers do something of their own and the strategy is used by them to this day.
At first it was not so bad, because they tried to add their own mini-games and their own additional features to the emulator.
Over time, there were more functions, downloads took longer, and mini-games and the built-in store were few people needed.
As a result, the emulator is overloaded with unnecessary functions, while the user only needs it as a convenient launcher for launching mobile games.
At the same time, LDPlayer does not add anything superfluous to the interface. There is just a standard desktop of an android device and the necessary set of settings on the right side of the program window.
In our opinion, this is much more convenient.
LDPlayer: Bluestacks – 4:1
Since Bluestacks is created and maintained by an American company, there is no problem with localization here. But Chinese developers have also recently learned how to make high-quality translations.
Of course, errors in the interface do happen but these cases are rare and not critical. Nevertheless, we must admit that there are no mistakes at all in Bluestacks and that’s why the American program wins here.
LDPlayer: Bluestacks – 4:2
6. Gaming Performance
Starting with version 4, Bluestacks became an extremely productive emulator, which was noticed by owners of weak PCs.
However, the emulator itself also consumes a lot of resources at the expense of the interface or something else. It takes a long time to load.
LDPlayer also works great with heavy games but makes it easier and faster. And the developers of LDPlayer keep regular updates to improve the compatibility. Thus, the Chinese emulator wins this category.
LDPlayer: Bluestacks – 5:2
So, we compared emulators according to five most important criteria. According to the results of comparison, LDPlayer won a convincing victory!
Bluestacks won only in one category – localization. But, frankly, in LDPlayer it also cannot be called bad. Everything is clear here, and errors are not critical.
Otherwise, the emulators are either equal, or the victory remains with LDPlayer. The main factor is performance.
If you also want to test out these two emulators, please download them from the links below.
What do you think of these emulators? Do you agree with the comparison results? Write your thoughts in the comments section below!