Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare receives a disappointing 2.0 Metacritic score

Madalina Dinita
by Madalina Dinita
Former Managing Editor
6 Comments
Download PDF

If we were to use one word to describe Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare’s user score, that word would be “disappointing”. The game received a shameful 2.0 user score on Metacritic from almost 200 reviews.

Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare has been plagued by various technical issues since the very day it was launched. This fact has definitely contributed to the very low user score the game has received, but there are also other reasons that made gamers give this note.

Many players threw harsh critics, suggesting that Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare might be interesting if you are a 12 year old who likes spawn camping. Indeed, gamers heavily criticized the overall poor gameplay and player base limitations.

As a matter of fact, the Windows Store and Steam versions of the game are not cross-compatible, which means that the PC playerbase is now split.

I hate this game it sucks sooo bad!!!! Players from windows store cant play with players from steam store! they split up their pc playerbase xD what a joke! oh and they finally added pay to win. Skins affect stats and the epics which affect stats the most are hidden behind paywall. now matter how much you play after paying 99 euros! you still aint getting it!

It appears that the 2.0 note does reflect the opinion of thousand of gamers: “Yes, I read all of the reviews and all of them seem genuine except maybe the positive ones.” However, some Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare fans suggest that all these negative reviews are nothing but a plan concocted by Titanfall 2 players to determine potential buyers to stay away from the game.

All of them are just desperate haters because Titanfall is less popular than this. Add to it the usual weirdo and an army of trolls.
Dex there is no reasoning with the unreasonable. Sadly there are no moderators that could just insta lock and ban stupidity and malice from the forums.

Have these negative reviews influenced your purchasing decision? Do you think that the 2.0 Metacritic user score reflects reality?

RELATED STORIES YOU NEED TO CHECK OUT:

  • Def sucks, first COD I’ve hated yet, avid player since the first COD and I’ve never been disappointed with a game enough to write a review. Btw, this sites a POS t

  • it does suck, theres no improvement over black ops 3 at all, i mean none at all. It could have been an expansion pack for black ops 3. SMDH but cod4 rocks. Oh and titanfall2 is wayyyyyyyyy better

  • This article is so stupid, Metacritic user reviews are a joke. Poor click bait. Title gives people the impression that these are critic scores.

  • Stay AWAY! from this game. It is basically a copy and paste of blops 3 with less speed and more insta spawn dying! Wait for COD4 Remastered to be sold stand-alone!!! Thats what 80% of people bought the game for anyways. IW is by far the worst COD ever made….with that being said. The MW remastered is amazing! Everything you remembered about cod4 is there jusy with prettier graphics, and alittle tuning to the weapons. other then that i give IW a 5.5 – 10 & COD4 RM a 9.2 – 10. The classic boots on the ground ( REAL LIFE! ) feelings events and the over all look of the game after all these years is a sight to see. BUT! IMO… i would not buy there piece of crap IW to get cod4….wait it out

  • Stop going by user scores in games published by Activision and EA, there is so much crap that passes as a “review” that user scores have become meaningless; all it takes is a few hundred people trolling to make the average dip.